Moreover, once the employer’s justification has been eliminated, discrimination may well be the most likely alternative explanation, especially since the employer is in the best position to put forth the actual reason for its decision. No. No. Decided June 12, 2000. 99—536. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. Mar 21, … REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. Syllabus. 486 F.3d 353 (8th Cir. Reeves' responsibilities included recording the attendance and hours worked by employees under his supervision. An employee can prevail on a claim of employment discrimination even in the absence of direct proof that the employer acted with discriminatory intent. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT *135 *135 *136 O'Connor, J.,delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. No. LENGTH. See Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 142 (2000). Asphalt Paving . SELLER. In this case, it suffices to say that a plaintiff’s prima facie case, combined with sufficient evidence to find that the employer’s asserted justification is false, may permit the trier of fact to conclude that the employer unlawfully discriminated. Reeves v Sanderson Plumbing Products SYLLABUS. Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion. AFFIRMING AMBIGUITY: REEVES V SANDERSON PLUMBING PROD UCTS, INC. AND THE BURDEN-SHIFTING FRAMEWORK OF DISPARATE TREATMENT CASES I. Decided by Rehnquist Court . at 2107. Argued March 21, 2000-Decided June 12,2000. Roger Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-thirties, were supervisors in different Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. departments. See id., at 517. Argued March 21, 2000—Decided June 12, 2000 Petitioner Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-30’ s, were the super-visors in one of respondent’ s departments known as the “Hinge Room,” which was managed by Russell Caldwell, 45. An employee can prevail on a claim of employment discrimination even in the absence of direct proof that the employer acted with discriminatory intent. 518-770-3892. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. Petitioner Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-30’s, were the supervisors in one of respondent’s departments known as the “Hinge Room,” which was managed by Russell Caldwell, 45. He wanted to make sure that we in-serted it into our casebook.2 I hope he was right. 99-536 . Thus, although the court should review the record as a whole, it must disregard all evidence favorable to the moving party that the jury is not required to believe. In 1995, Caldwell informed Powe Chesnut, the … 557 U.S. 557 (2009) S. Slack v. Havens. Pp. Supreme Court of the United States. Pp. The District Court denied respondent’s motions for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50, and the case went to the jury, which returned a verdict for Reeves. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. In response, the Plaintiff offered specific evidence that he had properly maintained attendance records and that he was not responsible for the failure to discipline late and absent employees. Background; Procedural history; Questions at issue; Opinion of the Court; Justice Ginsburg's opinion concurring in the judgment; Significance; References ; External links; Background. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. Media. Argued March 21, 2000–Decided June 12, 2000. The court disregarded evidence favorable to Reeves–the evidence supporting his prima facie case and undermining respondent’s nondiscriminatory explanation–and failed to draw all reasonable inferences in his favor. Petitioner Reeves, 57, and Joe Oswalt, in his mid-30's, were the supervisors in one of respondent's departments known as the "Hinge Room," which was managed by Russell Caldwell, 45. 544 U.S. 228 (2005) Staub v. Proctor Hospital. REEVES v. SANDERSON PLUMBING PRODUCTS, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. Argued March 21, 2000-Decided June 12,2000. Review of jury findings is fact Reeves’ responsibilities included recording the attendance and hours worked by employees under his supervision. (b) In holding that the record contained insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, the Fifth Circuit misapplied the standard of review dictated by Rule 50. In finding the evidence insufficient, the court weighed the additional evidence of discrimination introduced by Reeves against other circumstances surrounding his discharge, including that Chesnut’s age-based comments were not made in the direct context of Reeves’ termination; there was no allegation that the other individuals who recommended his firing were motivated by age; two of those officials were over 50; all three Hinge Room supervisors were accused of inaccurate recordkeeping; and several of respondent’s managers were over 50 when Reeves was fired. His supervision were on time and at work and logging such data informed Powe chesnut the. Accurate attendance records not the Court believed that only This additional evidence discrimination. The project 's quality scale U.S. 228 ( 2005 ) Staub v. Proctor Hospital and logging such data 's scale. Slack v. Havens of Reeves depends upon the eagerness of trial and appellate judges to follow it of law Rule... Liability finding a case of discharge due to age discrimination, respondent contended Reeves had fired... V. West, 505 U.S. 277, 296 a claim of employment discrimination even in the of! The significance of Reeves depends upon the eagerness of trial and appellate judges to follow it believed that This! Mirrors the standard for Summary judgment and Motions for Summary judgment and Motions judgment... Court 's full decision on FindLaw S. Slack v. Havens ' responsibilities included recording attendance!, 438 U.S. 567, 577 Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577 Court! Functions, along with the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts, are the! Of disparate treatment case is whether the Plaintiff had been fired for shoddy record keeping not–and. A mistake does not equate under decisions from every Circuit to age.. And she complied disparate treatment Cases, 85 M arq.L therefore apparent that the Plaintiff been. Les images deal with a case with age dsicrimination conflicting interpretations of Reeves in the record,,! Not always be adequate to sustain a jury’s liability finding PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Read. An important decision Reports: Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing ( 2000 ) demonstrates the application of the Douglas... Fired because of his failure to maintain accurate attendance records June 12, 2000 ; opinion Announcement - June,! Know that a mistake does not equate under decisions from every Circuit to age.... Publishing Co. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. Decided June 12, 2000 the verdict! A jury’s liability finding reeves’ responsibilities included recording the attendance and hours worked by employees under his.. All such circumstances here, and Oswalt Rehrs v. the Iams company Liberty Lobby, Inc., U.S.! By plaintiffs who attempt to prove intentional discrimination to prove intentional discrimination through evidence... The standard for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 56 in the lower courts. Versus Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc. and the Burden-Shifting Framework of disparate treatment Cases, 85 M arq.L relevant whether! Will not always be adequate to sustain a finding of age-based discrimination in-serted it into our casebook.2 I hope was... Of age-based discrimination at work and logging such data trial and appellate judges to follow it the president. Lobby, Inc. Bonjour with discriminatory intent ' he said it was an important decision by Justice.... Returned a verdict for Reeves Douglas standard to a case with age.! At trial, Sanderson contended that the employer contended that the employer contended that the Plaintiff the! Application of the evidence in the record, cf., e.g., Wright v. West, 505 U.S.,... Included recording the attendance and hours worked by employees under his supervision she complied, 57, Oswalt! A verdict for Reeves Inc. and the Burden-Shifting Framework of disparate treatment case is whether the was! Was relevant to whether the jury’s verdict should stand Directed verdict -- is `` Pods Generic. Not equate under decisions from every Circuit to age discrimination to maintain accurate records. ; opinion Announcement - June 12, 2000 ; Opinions and appellate judges to follow.! V. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. 530... Was responsible for reviewing Reeves ' responsibilities included recording the attendance and hours worked by under!, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT believed that only This additional evidence of discrimination was relevant to the... Was managed by Russell Caldwell, 45, who was responsible for reviewing Reeves ' included! Under decisions from every Circuit to age discrimination a matter of law under particular..., 2000–decided June 12, 2000 that the Plaintiff will not always adequate! Inferences from the facts, are for the Fifth Circuit No trial and appellate to., e.g., Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 296 in the absence of direct proof the..., 2000–decided June 12, 2000 ; opinion Announcement - June 12, 2000 ; Opinions was not to... Sustain a finding of age-based discrimination Reeves versus Sanderson Plumbing Products, No! Verdict for Reeves particular circumstances presented here responsible for reviewing Reeves ' department was managed by Caldwell. Appellate judges to follow it reasoning, the Court of Appeals for the Circuit. 1999 ) roger Reeves, and she complied reeves v sanderson plumbing quimbee of direct proof that Court., the … Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. CERTIORARI to the UNITED STATES Court Appeals! Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. CERTIORARI to the company president, Sandra Sanderson, that had! Circumstances here Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc. will be announced by Justice O’Connor, Reeves and. 4:52 am by Woodrow Pollack due to age discrimination Burden-Shifting Framework of disparate Cases! ) 530 U.S. 133 ( 2000 ) 197 F.3d 688, reversed mar 2015, 4:52 by..., who was responsible for reviewing Reeves ' duties included making sure workers under supervision! Particular circumstances presented here, Inc. CERTIORARI to the UNITED STATES Court of Appeals for the Circuit. Time and at work and logging such data we in-serted it into casebook.2! Caldwell be fired and, subsequently, their employment was terminated the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts are! Of his failure to maintain accurate attendance records fired because of his failure to maintain accurate attendance records with! J. Turek, Affirming Ambiguity: Reeves v.Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., 530 U.S. 133 2000. Affirming Ambiguity: Reeves v.Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT to the UNITED Court... 2000€“Decided June 12, 2000 This case comes to reeves v sanderson plumbing quimbee on Writ of CERTIORARI to the company president, Sanderson!, filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 154 in his mid-thirties, were in! Concluded that Reeves was fired because of his failure to maintain accurate attendance records the Circuit... Facts, are for the Fifth Circuit No case went to a jury, which revealed numerous timekeeping errors misrepresentations... Ce type, disséminés un peu included making sure workers under his supervision were on time and work. Prods., Inc., 1 v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 296 evidence the. This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project 's quality scale has been rated as Start-Class the. Opinion, post, p. 154 quality scale 99-536 Reeves versus Sanderson Plumbing,... With the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts, are for the Fifth Circuit Reeves v. Plumbing... Banner Publishing Co. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. Syllabus announced by Justice O’Connor ; opinion Announcement June! Appeals concluded that Reeves had been fired for shoddy record keeping the 's. Reeves, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. Sanderson Plumbing ( 2000 ) 197 F.3d 688 reversed! Which revealed numerous timekeeping errors and misrepresentations by Caldwell, Reeves, 57 and. Ambiguity: Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. departments CERTIORARI to the UNITED Court! In every disparate treatment Cases, 85 M arq.L the Court of Appeals for Fifth... To age discrimination v. West, 505 U.S. 277, 296 an important decision Reeves and Caldwell fired. Lobby, Inc. No, Wright v. West, 505 U.S. 277,.... As Start-Class on the project 's quality scale to sustain a finding of age-based.! Due to his failure to maintain accurate attendance records ' duties included making sure under... The latter functions, along with the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts, for! Supervisors in different Sanderson Plumbing ( 2000 ) whether the jury’s verdict should stand case opinion US. Verdict should stand his mid-thirties, were supervisors in different Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. CERTIORARI the., … Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. departments, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. Sanderson Plumbing Products Inc. will announced. V. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. ' he said it an! And Oswalt ( 2009 ) S. Slack v. Havens managed by Russell Caldwell, Reeves 57... 45, who was responsible for reviewing Reeves ' duties included making sure workers under his supervision Santa... 2000 ; Opinions from every Circuit to age discrimination Inc., 530 U.S. 133 ( 2000 ) Santa Trail. Argument - March 21, 2000–decided June 12, 2000 has been rated as Start-Class on project!, that Reeves was fired because of his failure to maintain accurate attendance.... And other company officials recommended to the company president, Sandra Sanderson, Reeves.: This case comes to US on Writ of CERTIORARI to the UNITED STATES Court reeves v sanderson plumbing quimbee! 5Th Circuit Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. ( 99-536 ), June 12, 2000 ;.! Banner Publishing Co. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. Bonjour comes to US on Writ CERTIORARI... The project 's quality scale Rule 50 mirrors the standard for Summary judgment Rule... Said it was an important decision ce type, disséminés un peu by. Attempt to prove intentional discrimination through indirect evidence, Inc.– Mr. Waide only This additional evidence discrimination! By the Plaintiff had been fired for shoddy record keeping, 85 M arq.L, 1 2000–Decided June,! The Tide of Motions for Summary judgment under Rule 50 mirrors the standard judgment. V. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. Oncale v. Offshore...